On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued a set of executive orders primarily focused on immigration and border security, many of which reflect policies from his first term. Below are more detailed descriptions of the key actions:

    1. National Emergency at the Southern Border
      • The president declared a national emergency at the southern border, aiming to allocate military funds for border wall construction, transporting immigrants, and increasing detention space. However, this effort was previously blocked in the first Trump administration and may face similar legal challenges, particularly from organizations like the ACLU and the Southern Border Communities Coalition (SBCC).
    2. Declare “Invasion” at the Southern Border
      • Trump’s order declares an “invasion” at the southern border, which could lead to suspending entry for individuals who cannot provide sufficient medical or criminal history information. While this may result in more border shutdowns, it’s unlikely to occur on a wide scale due to economic factors. Still, border crossers could face heightened scrutiny.
    3. Assign Military to “Seal” the Border
      • The military is tasked with sealing the border and responding to mass migration events. A plan is expected within 10 days, but this raises concerns about resource allocation since the military already has competing priorities.
    4. End Birthright Citizenship for Certain Immigrants
  • This order seeks to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to women who are unlawfully present or temporarily in the country (e.g., on a visa). A lawsuit filed by 18 states led by New York, California, and Colorado challenged the order, with a federal judge temporarily blocking it on January 23, 2025, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.” The Birth right citizenship order was temporality blocked by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour on Thursday January 23 by temporary restraining order after a hearing in Seattle. This was in response to lawsuit brought by Oregon, Arizona, Illinois and Washington state one of several suits opposing the administration’s efforts to curb the right of citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil.  The Judge told the attorney for the Justice Department how unconstitutional this order was, that he had been on the bench four decades and cannot recall  another case where such an issue was raised calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.”  The judge’s order blocks federal agencies from implementing the executive order while the case is under review. 
  1. Reinforce Registration Requirements for Undocumented Immigrants
    • This executive order seeks to more strictly enforce registration requirements for undocumented immigrants under 8 USC 1302. While this provision already exists, it has historically been under-enforced. However, without additional resources, it’s unclear how effective this order will be.
  2. Expansion of Expedited Removal Nationwide
    • Expedited removal, which previously applied only within 100 miles of the border, would now be extended across the entire country. This means undocumented immigrants who have been in the U.S. for less than two years could be deported without due process, which could spark legal and human rights concerns.
  3. Mandatory Detention in Deportation Proceedings
    • This policy mandates the detention of individuals undergoing deportation proceedings. However, without more resources and detention space, the implementation could be problematic. The cost of detention (between $250 and $500 per person) further complicates enforcement.
  4. Withholding Funds from Sanctuary Jurisdictions
    • The administration seeks to withhold federal funds from “sanctuary” cities or states that do not comply with federal immigration enforcement. A similar effort during Trump’s first term was defeated in court, and it’s uncertain whether this will be upheld now.
  5. Mandatory Employment Verification
    • This order prioritizes the enforcement of employment verification for workers under 8 USC 1324a, which requires employers to verify the legal status of employees. While this is already law, a more rigorous enforcement could create economic disruptions, particularly if many workers lack proper documentation.
  6. Terminate Categorical Parole Programs
  • Trump’s administration plans to end categorical parole programs for certain nationalities (e.g., Cubans, Haitians, Venezuelans). While parole will still be available on a case-by-case basis, this could affect many immigrants who are currently in the U.S. under these programs.
  1. Suspend the Refugee Program
  • The refugee admissions program would be suspended starting January 27, 2025. Trump had already significantly reduced the number of refugees during his first term, and this continuation could harm vulnerable families and reduce the number of refugees allowed into the U.S.
  1. Additional Visa Vetting and Possible Suspensions
  • The administration may increase vetting for visa applicants, especially from certain countries, and potentially suspend visas for certain nations. This mirrors a policy from Trump’s first term, which could strain relations with affected countries.
  1. Reinstating the “Remain in Mexico” Program
  • The policy would require asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed in the U.S. This would end the use of the CBP One app that allowed asylum seekers to apply from within the U.S. The move could lead to logistical and humanitarian challenges for asylum seekers.
  1. Review and Audit of NGOs Assisting Immigrants
  • NGOs that assist undocumented immigrants could be subject to more scrutiny. However, most of these organizations already report their activities under strict guidelines, so the actual impact may be minimal.
  1. Denial of Public Benefits for Undocumented Immigrants
  • The order seeks to deny public benefits to undocumented immigrants. Since most undocumented individuals are not eligible for these benefits anyway, this measure could cause fear and discourage eligible individuals from applying for benefits.

These executive orders reflect a hardline approach to immigration, with several actions likely to face significant legal challenges and logistical difficulties. Without additional funding and resources, many of these policies may not be feasible to implement. Additionally, they could heighten tensions with immigrant communities and prompt widespread legal battles that may delay or block implementation.

Translate »